Nee-san, if only you can read this message.
Life is so complicated. But somehow it is also so simple. Like it has some kind of line of plot in a play. The earth is the center stage, our persona are our costumes, and the dialogues are settled.
We live in harmony and then accident happen. So the time goes the being sent us upon a climax. Then the answer comes as the hero. The heroes are within us or out there somewhere. But they are all humans with all of their humble disability.
But when we hike down the anti climax, it’s when we earn our prizes.
So a problem strikes me as a second man. Do the hero slept within me? Or within the first man, I don’t know.
I’m too busy with my own role. Seeking the answers to all my questions.
And then they said whenever there is a meeting, parting always exist after it. Having thought about it.
No matter which part are we playing on. Or which role that happens to appear or not to. Both of them may part physically. May sounds cliche, but does heart ever parts?
Our body may parts and separates. Our mind may head to a different paths. But when the so called parting happens, our heart may not parts. Does the meeting of two hearts never parts. Should we call the partings cease to exist?
Or have you forgotten all of the things standing before you when we parts our body? Or have our hearts never meets after all?
Or have the play forbid us to our role? I wish I could find the answer so I decided to continue the play and this script I know nothing.
Ⅸ Grimoire of Insanity: part THREE
jangan salahin saya kalau saya kebanyakan main FFTWOTL, “yes! Dark Knight udah master!!”
Nulis sendiri atau ngambil dari FFT nih?
Dampak internet dari tadi siang menyebabkan saya untuk membiarkan otak ini mengabaikan hal-hal tersirat… jadi mikirnya nanti aja.
*skip, baca yang paling bawah*
PAMERRRRR!!! PAMEEEEEEEE!!! *Alt +F4*
Kudu ke Jogja, supaya aku pinjem PSP!
….bingung…. belibet.. Soalnya saya lebih lama mantengin komputer dibanding si Xaliber. Otak gosong.
*baca ulang dengan kepala yang lebih dingin*
Hmm. Yang saya tangkap dari beberapa paragraf diatas:
1. Adanya pencarian akan ’sesuatu’, entah apa itu.
2. Adanya permasalahan karena bukan menjadi korban/giliran pertama, tapi justru jadi yang kedua? Mungkin juga ada kaitannya dengan pelopor dan pemopuler.
3. Lalu adanya separasi.
Dah, segitu dulu.
Btw, saya masih belum nangkep filsafat-filsafat disini masuknya ke kategori apa… kayaknya lebih enak analogi teh poci-nya Bertrand Russell.
Maaf, saya belum fasih berbahasa Inggris. Jadi belum bisa koment dulu yach. Tapi, begitu ada postingan bahasa Indonesia akan saya koment.
Maaf bangat ya. Masih oot.